Tesco’s “Fire and Rehire” Tactics

What can be learnt from Tesco's experience in the Courts?

Dismissal and reengagement, also known as “fire and rehire”, is a practice that can be used by employers when employees refuse to agree to proposed new terms. The Court of Appeal has recently overturned a decision allowing Tesco to continue using the “fire and rehire” tactic.

Facts

Tesco was keen not to lose experienced warehouse staff during business changes and therefore between 2007 and 2009 it offered employees an incentive known as Retained Pay, whereby they received a significant pay increase if employees moved to other sites. Retained Pay was stated to be “guaranteed for life”.

In 2021, Tesco sought employee consent to bring Retained Pay to an end in return for a lump sum payment. Thereafter, Tesco sought to dismiss staff who did not agree to this change and to reengage them on less favourable terms, following which employees sought an injunction to prevent this from happening.

Outcome

In February 2022, the High Court implied a term into the contracts that Tesco would not dismiss employees for the purposes of removing the employees’ right to the Retained Pay. It also granted a highly unusual injunction, banning Tesco from dismissing and rehiring workers on these less favourable terms.

In July 2022, the Court of Appeal overturned this decision, and removed the injunction. It was held that although there was no time limit to the Retained Pay clause, the clause should have been interpreted using its natural and ordinary meaning, namely that the entitlement to Retained Pay would only continue as long as that contract continued, and that Tesco would have the right to serve notice in the usual way.

Implications and considerations

The key takeaway from these cases is that it is important to ensure any contractual terms are clear and unambiguous. Any clauses granting benefits such as “Retained Pay” should be flexible to avoid them being construed as ‘permanent’.

The “fire and rehire” tactic remains a valid option to use when seeking to change contractual terms. However, due to the risks associated with it, this practice should only be used as a last resort.

CONTACT GITA

If you would like more information or advice relating to this article or an Employment law matter, please do not hesitate to contact Gita Patel on 01727 798049

Read the latest Employment Views & Insights
They seek to understand their clients and advise accordingly to achieve the outcomes that they require for their business needs.
Chambers and Partners
SA Law Work Life red mug and glasses
Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
Can Legal Action be Taken Against Discriminatory Recruitment Criteria?

It has been ruled by several employment tribunals that gender critical beliefs should not be discriminated against in the workplace, and any discriminatory…

Read More
Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
What Harpur Trust v Brazel Means for Holiday Pay

An increased holiday entitlement may benefit up to 700,000 workers following the Harpur Trust v Brazel Supreme Court judgement.In a recent article published…

Read More
SA Law Work Life red mug and glasses
Views & Insights
The Impact of Failure to Follow the Correct Procedure When Making Redundancies

Stephanie Clarke explains the legal consequences employers face if they fail to follow the correct redundancy procedures.

Read More
Phone Box with Man in a Bowler Hat
As there is so much expertise on offer from SA Law they can provide a legal expert on all areas so that it can be handled under one roof.
Legal 500
Photo of a red arrow SA Law
Views & Insights
Google: Parent Firm Alphabet Announces Worldwide Redundancies

Chris Cook comments on the recent redundancies made by Alphabet, a parent firm of Google.

Read More
Education Open Book SA Law
Views & Insights
Workers Who Breach Proposed Anti-Strike Law En Masse 'Unlikely' to Face Sackings

Gita Patel discusses the implications of the Government's proposed plans on anti-strike legislation.

Read More
SA Law Red arrow neon light image
Views & Insights
Which Way to go With Work From Home

In a recently published article, James Cresswell discusses flexible working and what it includes after James Dyson criticises the Government’s plans to…

Read More
SA Law Employment Laptop
Views & Insights
Staff Monitoring: Ensure you Consult Before Imposing a System

It’s becoming more common that employers want to avoid a ‘Big Brother’ management style when it comes to monitoring staff, so what’s the best way to do…

Read More
They are knowledgeable, with a commercial mindset, but also down to earth and friendly so it is easy to be very honest with them.
Chambers and Partners

© SA LAW 2023

Every care is taken in the preparation of our articles. However, no responsibility can be accepted to any person who acts on the basis of information contained in them alone. You are recommended to obtain specific advice in respect of individual cases.