Tesco’s “Fire and Rehire” Tactics

What can be learnt from Tesco's experience in the Courts?

Dismissal and reengagement, also known as “fire and rehire”, is a practice that can be used by employers when employees refuse to agree to proposed new terms. The Court of Appeal has recently overturned a decision allowing Tesco to continue using the “fire and rehire” tactic.

Facts

Tesco was keen not to lose experienced warehouse staff during business changes and therefore between 2007 and 2009 it offered employees an incentive known as Retained Pay, whereby they received a significant pay increase if employees moved to other sites. Retained Pay was stated to be “guaranteed for life”.

In 2021, Tesco sought employee consent to bring Retained Pay to an end in return for a lump sum payment. Thereafter, Tesco sought to dismiss staff who did not agree to this change and to reengage them on less favourable terms, following which employees sought an injunction to prevent this from happening.

Outcome

In February 2022, the High Court implied a term into the contracts that Tesco would not dismiss employees for the purposes of removing the employees’ right to the Retained Pay. It also granted a highly unusual injunction, banning Tesco from dismissing and rehiring workers on these less favourable terms.

In July 2022, the Court of Appeal overturned this decision, and removed the injunction. It was held that although there was no time limit to the Retained Pay clause, the clause should have been interpreted using its natural and ordinary meaning, namely that the entitlement to Retained Pay would only continue as long as that contract continued, and that Tesco would have the right to serve notice in the usual way.

Implications and considerations

The key takeaway from these cases is that it is important to ensure any contractual terms are clear and unambiguous. Any clauses granting benefits such as “Retained Pay” should be flexible to avoid them being construed as ‘permanent’.

The “fire and rehire” tactic remains a valid option to use when seeking to change contractual terms. However, due to the risks associated with it, this practice should only be used as a last resort.

CONTACT GITA

If you would like more information or advice relating to this article or an Employment law matter, please do not hesitate to contact Gita Patel on 01727 798049

Read the latest Employment Views & Insights
They seek to understand their clients and advise accordingly to achieve the outcomes that they require for their business needs.
Chambers and Partners
SA Law Work Life red mug and glasses
Lets Talk About It SA Law
Views & Insights
Truss’ “bonfire of workers’ rights” Leaves Lawyers Unconvinced

The Conservative Party’s Liz Truss wants to review existing EU worker protections in an attempt to improve the competitiveness of the UK economy.

Read More
Corporate Night View of London SA Law
Views & Insights
Changes to Right to Work Checks

Concessions on right to work checks implemented by the Home Office in the midst of the pandemic, came to an end on 30 September 2022. Gemma Jones explains…

Read More
SA Law - Lightbulbs image with fillament
Views & Insights
Holiday Pay for Part Year Workers

Under the Working Time Regulations, the 5.6 weeks’ annual leave entitlement must not be pro-rated for part-year workers on permanent contracts.

Read More
Phone Box with Man in a Bowler Hat
As there is so much expertise on offer from SA Law they can provide a legal expert on all areas so that it can be handled under one roof.
Legal 500
Red and yellow leaves, blue sky SA Law
Views & Insights
Why does employment status matter?

How do you know if your staff are employees, workers or self-employed, and what difference does it make?

Read More
SA Law light moving
Views & Insights
What directors can learn from the collapse of NMCN

CFOs and other directors can use the collapse of NMCN to put their own house in order and help ward of the impact of recessionary forces.

Read More
Join our team puzzle piece SA Law
Views & Insights
SA Law expands employment team

SA Law is proud to welcome James Cresswell and Stephanie Clarke to its employment team, bringing the team size up to seven qualified lawyers.

Read More
Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
Insolvency insights - the NMCN collapse

Insolvency solicitor, Helen Young and employment lawyer Nishma Chudasama consider what accountants can learn from the failure of NMCN.

Read More
They are knowledgeable, with a commercial mindset, but also down to earth and friendly so it is easy to be very honest with them.
Chambers and Partners

© SA LAW 2022

Every care is taken in the preparation of our articles. However, no responsibility can be accepted to any person who acts on the basis of information contained in them alone. You are recommended to obtain specific advice in respect of individual cases.