Tesco’s “Fire and Rehire” Tactics

What can be learnt from Tesco's experience in the Courts?
Tue 11th Oct 2022

Dismissal and reengagement, also known as “fire and rehire”, is a practice that can be used by employers when employees refuse to agree to proposed new terms. The Court of Appeal has recently overturned a decision allowing Tesco to continue using the “fire and rehire” tactic.

Facts

Tesco was keen not to lose experienced warehouse staff during business changes and therefore between 2007 and 2009 it offered employees an incentive known as Retained Pay, whereby they received a significant pay increase if employees moved to other sites. Retained Pay was stated to be “guaranteed for life”.

In 2021, Tesco sought employee consent to bring Retained Pay to an end in return for a lump sum payment. Thereafter, Tesco sought to dismiss staff who did not agree to this change and to reengage them on less favourable terms, following which employees sought an injunction to prevent this from happening.

Outcome

In February 2022, the High Court implied a term into the contracts that Tesco would not dismiss employees for the purposes of removing the employees’ right to the Retained Pay. It also granted a highly unusual injunction, banning Tesco from dismissing and rehiring workers on these less favourable terms.

In July 2022, the Court of Appeal overturned this decision, and removed the injunction. It was held that although there was no time limit to the Retained Pay clause, the clause should have been interpreted using its natural and ordinary meaning, namely that the entitlement to Retained Pay would only continue as long as that contract continued, and that Tesco would have the right to serve notice in the usual way.

Implications and considerations

The key takeaway from these cases is that it is important to ensure any contractual terms are clear and unambiguous. Any clauses granting benefits such as “Retained Pay” should be flexible to avoid them being construed as ‘permanent’.

The “fire and rehire” tactic remains a valid option to use when seeking to change contractual terms. However, due to the risks associated with it, this practice should only be used as a last resort.

CONTACT GITA

If you would like more information or advice relating to this article or an Employment law matter, please do not hesitate to contact Gita Patel on 01727 798049

Read the latest Employment Views & Insights
SA Law Red arrow neon light image
Views & Insights
Handling personal data within GDPR

Frequently, employers receive Data Subject Access Requests (DSAR) from their employees or former employees. These are requests for information about personal…

Read More
SA Law Employment Laptop
Views & Insights
National Minimum Wage: 371,000 workers underpaid in April 2024

The Low Pay Commission (LPC) estimates that around 371,000 people were underpaid in the year to April 2024. The figures published in the Compliance and…

Read More
SA Law Employment Laptop
Views & Insights
National Minimum Wage increase from April 2025

Government announces new minimum wage rates

Read More
SA Law Employment Laptop
Views & Insights
Tesco Fire and Rehire Disallowed Rules Supreme Court

In Tesco Stores v Union of Shop, Distributive and Allied Workers and others, five Justices of the Supreme Court reimposed an injunction preventing Tesco…

Read More
Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
Amendments to the Employment Rights Bill

In October, the Government published its landmark Employment Rights Bill. See our article on this topic: “New Employment Rights Bill: Key Implications…

Read More
SA Law Employment Laptop
Views & Insights
2025 Employment Law Changes: Rate Changes

This is an update to our previous article (How the Autumn Budget 2024 Impacts Employers and Employees) to factor in the new rates in relation to family…

Read More
Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
Comments About an Employee’s Accent Could be ‘Related to’ Race Under Harassment Law

In Carozzi v University of Hertfordshire and another, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held that the Employment Tribunal was incorrect to find that…

Read More
Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
How to Support Neurodiverse Employees

There are common struggles when it comes to businesses managing employees with neurodiversity. From neurodiverse employees not wanting to mention they…

Read More

© SA LAW 2025

Every care is taken in the preparation of our articles. However, no responsibility can be accepted to any person who acts on the basis of information contained in them alone. You are recommended to obtain specific advice in respect of individual cases.