"Gay Cake" row results in most expensive cake in UK history

Our Employment team comment on the controversial cake case

In Lee v Ashers Baking Company Ltd., four years after the case began, the Supreme Court decisively ruled that the bakery's refusal to make a cake with a slogan supporting same-sex marriage was not discriminatory. The five justices of the Supreme Court were unanimous in their judgement.

The two directors of the bakery are pious Christians who oppose the notion of same-sex marriage as being inconsistent with their religious beliefs. Therefore, when Mr Lee, a gay man and active member of the LGBT community in Northern Ireland, asked for a cake to be decorated with the caption “Support Gay Marriage”, the bakery declined to do so on the basis that it was a Christian business.

Mr Lee saw the bakery’s refusal as an affront to his sexual orientation and consequently brought proceedings against it for discrimination. Judge Brownlie of the Belfast County Court held that, although the bakery would have supplied Mr Lee with a cake that did not have such a slogan and would have also refused an order for a cake with the same message from a heterosexual customer, the bakery’s refusal was because it opposes same-sex marriage which is indissociable from sexual orientation. The bakery appealed to the Northern Ireland Court of Appeal which held that Judge Brownlie had been correct to find that there had been direct discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation.

The UK’s highest court, however, had an entirely distinct view on the matter. Lady Hale, giving the Supreme Court’s unanimous judgment, explained that the bakery’s objection was to the message on the cake, not to any personal characteristics of the messenger or of anyone with whom he was associated. The court, therefore, held that there was no evidence that the bakery had discriminated on the ground of sexual orientation.

Not only has the cake at the centre of this dispute, which originally would have cost £36.50, proved to be the most expensive in UK history, it has also raised concerns amongst the LGBT community and Equality Commission about the application of equality law in the commercial sphere.

Read more on the Lee v Ashers Baking Company Ltd 'Gay Cake' case here.

Read the latest Employment Views & Insights
They seek to understand their clients and advise accordingly to achieve the outcomes that they require for their business needs.
Chambers and Partners
SA Law Work Life red mug and glasses
Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
This Week’s Fine Imposed on Facebook Data

In a recently written article published in The Legal Diary, Christine Caffrey was asked to comment on the news of Facebook being fined €1.2bn…

Read More
Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
Government Announces Changes to Working Time Regulations, TUPE and Non-Compete Clauses

Emily Morrison discusses the significant changes announced by the Government on Working Time Regulations, TUPE and Non-Compete Clauses.

Read More
SA Law Employment Laptop
Views & Insights
Employee Sabbaticals: Business Benefits and Tips on Getting the Policy Right

Gita Patel outlines the business benefits of offering sabbatical leave to employees.

Read More
Phone Box with Man in a Bowler Hat
As there is so much expertise on offer from SA Law they can provide a legal expert on all areas so that it can be handled under one roof.
Legal 500
SA Law Employment Laptop
Views & Insights
Employment Law Update

James Cresswell and Nishma Chudasama discuss the 5 legal updates employers need to know this April.

Read More
Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
Can Legal Action be Taken Against Discriminatory Recruitment Criteria?

It has been ruled by several employment tribunals that gender critical beliefs should not be discriminated against in the workplace, and any discriminatory…

Read More
Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
Consultation on Holiday Pay Following Harpur Trust v Brazel

The Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) has concluded its consultation in response to the Harpur Trust v Brazel case, which…

Read More
Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
Changes to look out for from the Spring Budget 2023

Getting people “back into work” is the main focus of Chancellor Jeremy Hunt’s Spring Budget announced on 15 March 2023. The reform will impact employees…

Read More
They are knowledgeable, with a commercial mindset, but also down to earth and friendly so it is easy to be very honest with them.
Chambers and Partners

© SA LAW 2023

Every care is taken in the preparation of our articles. However, no responsibility can be accepted to any person who acts on the basis of information contained in them alone. You are recommended to obtain specific advice in respect of individual cases.