Employee status – what’s in a label?

SA Law's employment team explore the importance of establishing 'employment status'

The issue of employment status is a muddled, yet essential, issue for organisations and individuals. The distinction between ‘employee’, ‘worker’ and ‘self-employed’ is highly contested, and for good reason; many important legal rights are only available to employees, and an increasing number of statutory rights are available to workers but not those self-employed.

The Supreme Court ruling in Uber BV and ors v Aslam and ors [2021] made all the headlines earlier this year, but the recent judgment of the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) in the case of Nursing and Midwifery Council v Somerville [2021] has also provided some important guidance on this issue.

Nursing and Midwifery Council v Somerville

Mr Somerville was appointed by the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) as a panel chair. He brought a claim against the NMC for holiday pay. At the initial hearing in July 2020, the East London Employment Tribunal (ET) held that the claimant was not an employee as he was under no obligation to accept and perform a minimum amount of work (known as an irreducible minimum of obligation). It did, however, find him to be a ‘worker’ via the series of individual contracts which arose each time he agreed to sit, giving rise to an overarching contract in relation to the provision of his services.

The NMC appealed this decision, arguing that the lack of an irreducible minimum of obligation was inconsistent with ‘worker’ status. This argument was rejected by the EAT, which concluded that an irreducible minimum of obligation was not a prerequisite for ‘worker’ status. It did not accept that the findings in Uber meant that an irreducible minimum of obligation was a requirement for worker status. Instead, it held that:

  • There was a contract to perform work or services between the parties at all material times;
  • The Claimant had agreed to provide his services personally at each sitting;
  • The Claimant provided his services under an overarching agreement; and
  • Each of these occasions was the subject of a specific contract between the parties.

Comment

The ruling of the EAT gives further hope to those in the ‘gig economy’ of establishing worker status and the benefits that come with it. It also acts as a warning to employers when classifying individuals as self-employed. 

CONTACT BETH

If you would like more information or advice relating to this article or an Employment law matter, please do not hesitate to contact Beth Leng on 01727 798046.

Read the latest Employment Views & Insights
They seek to understand their clients and advise accordingly to achieve the outcomes that they require for their business needs.
Chambers and Partners
SA Law Work Life red mug and glasses
SA Law - Lightbulbs image with fillament
Views & Insights
Holiday Pay for Part Year Workers

Under the Working Time Regulations, the 5.6 weeks’ annual leave entitlement must not be pro-rated for part-year workers on permanent contracts.

Read More
Red and yellow leaves, blue sky SA Law
Views & Insights
Why does employment status matter?

How do you know if your staff are employees, workers or self-employed, and what difference does it make?

Read More
SA Law light moving
Views & Insights
What directors can learn from the collapse of NMCN

CFOs and other directors can use the collapse of NMCN to put their own house in order and help ward of the impact of recessionary forces.

Read More
Phone Box with Man in a Bowler Hat
As there is so much expertise on offer from SA Law they can provide a legal expert on all areas so that it can be handled under one roof.
Legal 500
Join our team puzzle piece SA Law
Views & Insights
SA Law expands employment team

SA Law is proud to welcome James Cresswell and Stephanie Clarke to its employment team, bringing the team size up to seven qualified lawyers.

Read More
Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
Insolvency insights - the NMCN collapse

Insolvency solicitor, Helen Young and employment lawyer Nishma Chudasama consider what accountants can learn from the failure of NMCN.

Read More
SA Law Changes Clock
Views & Insights
Trialling the 4-day working week

70 businesses are taking part in a 4-day working week trial, for no loss of pay. What could this mean for employers, employees and customer service?

Read More
GDPR Numbers Image SA Law
Views & Insights
The Future of Data Protection in the UK

'UK GDPR' - What is the Data Reform Bill?

Read More
They are knowledgeable, with a commercial mindset, but also down to earth and friendly so it is easy to be very honest with them.
Chambers and Partners

© SA LAW 2022

Every care is taken in the preparation of our articles. However, no responsibility can be accepted to any person who acts on the basis of information contained in them alone. You are recommended to obtain specific advice in respect of individual cases.