SA Law Employment Laptop

Employee status – what’s in a label?

SA Law's employment team explore the importance of establishing 'employment status'
Fri 25th Jun 2021

The issue of employment status is a muddled, yet essential, issue for organisations and individuals. The distinction between ‘employee’, ‘worker’ and ‘self-employed’ is highly contested, and for good reason; many important legal rights are only available to employees, and an increasing number of statutory rights are available to workers but not those self-employed.

The Supreme Court ruling in Uber BV and ors v Aslam and ors [2021] made all the headlines earlier this year, but the recent judgment of the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) in the case of Nursing and Midwifery Council v Somerville [2021] has also provided some important guidance on this issue.

Nursing and Midwifery Council v Somerville

Mr Somerville was appointed by the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) as a panel chair. He brought a claim against the NMC for holiday pay. At the initial hearing in July 2020, the East London Employment Tribunal (ET) held that the claimant was not an employee as he was under no obligation to accept and perform a minimum amount of work (known as an irreducible minimum of obligation). It did, however, find him to be a ‘worker’ via the series of individual contracts which arose each time he agreed to sit, giving rise to an overarching contract in relation to the provision of his services.

The NMC appealed this decision, arguing that the lack of an irreducible minimum of obligation was inconsistent with ‘worker’ status. This argument was rejected by the EAT, which concluded that an irreducible minimum of obligation was not a prerequisite for ‘worker’ status. It did not accept that the findings in Uber meant that an irreducible minimum of obligation was a requirement for worker status. Instead, it held that:

  • There was a contract to perform work or services between the parties at all material times;
  • The Claimant had agreed to provide his services personally at each sitting;
  • The Claimant provided his services under an overarching agreement; and
  • Each of these occasions was the subject of a specific contract between the parties.

Comment

The ruling of the EAT gives further hope to those in the ‘gig economy’ of establishing worker status and the benefits that come with it. It also acts as a warning to employers when classifying individuals as self-employed. 

CONTACT BETH

If you would like more information or advice relating to this article or an Employment law matter, please do not hesitate to contact Beth Leng on 01727 798046.

Read the latest Employment Views & Insights
Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
Workplace Attendance: Enforcing Compliance

Workplace attendance has been steadily decreasing, and there is little sign that this will change. Centre for Cities, an independent think tank, has published…

Read More
SA Law Red arrow neon light image
Views & Insights
Campbell v Sheffield Teaching North Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (2025) EAT 42

Decision: The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) upheld a tribunal’s decision that an employer was not liable for an employee’s racially harassing…

Read More
Relax
Views & Insights
Is Your Business Summer Ready?

The sun is shining, the trilogy of Bank holidays have come and gone and so thoughts are naturally turning to the summer break. July and August present…

Read More
SA Law Red arrow neon light image
Views & Insights
Employment Rights Bill

Introduced on 10th October 2024, the Employment Rights Bill proposes significant and extensive changes to UK employment law.Alongside this, the government…

Read More
Views & Insights
UK Immigration Reforms: Key Policy Changes Announced

Earlier today the Government’s long-awaited and eagerly anticipated White Paper, Restoring Control over the Immigration System, was published.Purportedly…

Read More
SA Law Employment Laptop
Views & Insights
Supreme Court Ruling in For Woman Scotland v Scottish Ministers

On 16th April 2025, the Supreme Court handed down their judgement in the case of ‘For Woman Scotland v Scottish Ministers’. Their judgement stated that,…

Read More
Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
Injury to Feelings: Vento Bands Increased

The President of the Employment Tribunals has confirmed an increase in the compensation bands (known as Vento bands) awarded for injury to feeling in…

Read More
SA Law Employment Laptop
Views & Insights
Employment Rights Bill: ‘The Right to Switch Off’?

What is “The Right to Switch Off”?The Government proposed plans for the “right to switch off” as part of their Employment Rights Bill (ERB). Through this,…

Read More

© SA LAW 2025

Every care is taken in the preparation of our articles. However, no responsibility can be accepted to any person who acts on the basis of information contained in them alone. You are recommended to obtain specific advice in respect of individual cases.