A guide to flexible working & flexible working requests

Flexible working can assist employers in attracting and retaining talented candidates and staff. Our guide covers the key questions and considerations for making or responding to a flexible working request.

Flexible working is increasingly becoming a feature of working life, and can assist employers in attracting and retaining talented candidates and staff. However, an often unjustified fear of changing the status quo, creating a precedent and potentially losing control of employees can hamper employers from embracing the benefits that flexible working can offer for their workforce and, ultimately, their business. 

A survey has revealed that over half of its participants felt that flexible working has affected their career. The Workingmums Annual Survey 2017 found that whilst 42% of women in work have successfully applied to work flexibly, 47% of those feel that this has affected their career progression and 52% of those working part time feel that their working pattern means they miss out on professional opportunities such as training.

So, how should flexible working requests be handled and what could reduce dissatisfaction amongst the flexible workforce?

The basics – What is flexible working?

Flexible working comes in many guises, and, in essence, is a change from the ‘normal’ arrangements for working. It can relate to the place of work, for example homeworking, or the hours to be worked. Part-time working is probably the most common type of flexible working, but other variations include flexitime, staggered hours, compressed hours, or job-sharing.

Who has the right to make a flexible working request?

Employees don't have the right to work flexibly, but they do have the right to make a request to do so provided that they:

  • are an employee (not a worker); 
  • have at least 26 weeks' service; and 
  • have not made a flexible working request in the previous 12 months.

It is, of course, open to employers to dispense with some or all of these requirements.

How do you make a request for flexible working?

The request should be written and dated, and should state that it is a request for flexible working made under the statutory procedure. The employee will need to explain what changes they are seeking and from when, what effects the changes might have and how the effects could be dealt with. 

How to respond to a flexible working request - What is the process?

Employers must deal with the request within three months (unless mutually agreed otherwise) and in a "reasonable manner". What constitutes ‘reasonable’ isn’t defined in law, but ACAS guidance recommends that an employer should hold a meeting with the employee to discuss the request, offer them the right to be accompanied and allow them the opportunity to appeal any decision to reject the request.

What are the grounds for rejecting a flexible working request?

Rejection must be on the grounds of one or more specified business reasons, which should be confirmed in writing to the employee. The specified reasons are:

  • the burden of additional costs;
  • inability to meet client/customer demand;
  • inability to reorganise work among other employees;
  • inability to recruit additional employees;
  • detrimental effect on quality;
  • detrimental effect on performance;
  • insufficient work when the requesting employee proposes to work; and
  • planned structural changes.

Employers should consider the request carefully before coming to a conclusion and are well advised to ensure that any business reasons for rejection are backed up by evidence. If you aren’t sure how the request will work in practice, you could consider implementing the change on a trial basis, or if it really isn’t possible to accommodate, it is worthwhile considering whether there is any compromise that might be suggested to the employee for them to consider.

Whilst employees may bring a Tribunal claim in respect of a rejected request, the Tribunal’s role is not to question the business reasons behind the rejection, but simply to ascertain whether:

  • the correct procedure was followed;
  • the request was taken seriously;
  • the decision was based on correct facts; and
  • the reasons given were within the ones permitted under legislation.

If the employer is found to be at fault, the Tribunal can order reconsideration of the decision and can award up to eight weeks’ pay (this is at a capped amount which increases in April of each year - £508 per week for 2018/2019). 

Flexible Working Requests & Discrimination Claims

The more significant risk in failing to deal properly with a flexible working request is that it could be held to be unlawful discrimination, in which case potential compensation is unlimited.

In particular, rejecting a flexible working request from a female employee might lead to a complaint of indirect sex discrimination. This is on the grounds that the rejection of a flexible working request disproportionately impacts women (as they’re more likely than men to have childcare responsibilities).

To defeat such a claim an employer needs to show its decision was "objectively justified", which in essence means they must have fairly rejected the request after due consideration and for sound business reasons. Unlike claims under the flexible working legislation, tribunals will examine the commercial rationale behind the decision in detail, and it is crucial that it stands up to scrutiny.

Next Steps - Training managers to deal with flexible working requests effectively

The 2017 ACAS Research Paper on flexible working for parents returning to work identifies line managers as playing a crucial part in the success of the flexible workforce. It suggests that without training and support there is a risk that line managers may not be equipped to manage flexible workers effectively, and that there is a greater risk of unconscious bias being demonstrated in relation to requests for flexibility, performance and career development opportunities. It is unsurprising then that the Workingmums Annual Survey revealed dissatisfaction amongst those who have already had their flexible working requests agreed.

If all managers are trained to effectively manage flexible workers then they are more likely to focus on output and productivity when assessing performance (rather than simply on hours worked). This ensures that those who work flexibly continue to have their careers managed but are not afraid that their working arrangement is the reason for any performance concerns. Investing in training at management level should result in a greater understanding of the benefit of a flexible workforce, which in turn should encourage better practices amongst the workforce as a whole. This will mean that professional opportunities are provided fairly to all staff, regardless of their working hours.

CONTACT KEELY

If you would like more information or advice relating to this article or an Employment law matter, please do not hesitate to contact Keely Rushmore on 01727 798046 
Knowledge Share

SA Law's Knowledge Share | January 2019

Read the January 2019 edition: Flexible working questions answered, smart strategies for new staff & social media, plus – is Veganism a protected characteristic?

Read More
The team at SA Law LLP has ‘excellent knowledge of employment law’. Practice head Chris Cook is recommended.
The Legal 500
SA Law Work Life red mug and glasses
Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
Increased rights for agency and zero-hours workers

The ‘Good Work Plan’ aims to address the rights of those with atypical worker statuses, including agency workers and those on zero-hours contracts.

Read More
Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
Consultation into extending redundancy protection for pregnant women and new parents

New consultation for redundancy protection while on or shortly after maternity leave or shared parental leave.

Read More
SA Law Red arrow neon light image
Views & Insights
Google issued with £44m fine over GDPR breach

Head of Employment and Data Protection, Chris Cook, explains Google's GDPR breach that led to landmark £44 million fine.

Read More
Chris Cook handles the full range of employment law for both individuals and organisations. He receives particular recognition for his strong TUPE expertise.…
Chambers & Partners
Phone Box with Man in a Bowler Hat
Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
CEO and average worker pay gap reporting launches

Latest comment in HR Magazine: Keely explains what HR teams should know about the CEO and average worker pay gap regulations, which come into force in…

Read More
Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
Deliveroo riders’ lose latest challenge to their employment status

The latest development in the Deliveroo gig-economy case sees riders appeal for trade union representation denied

Read More
Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
Vegan takes employer to tribunal over 'philosophical beef'

Partner, Chris Cook comments on the recent tribunal over an ex-employee claiming he was sacked for being vegan.

Read More
Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
Is veganism a protected characteristic?

Partner Chris Cook, writes about the recent case brought by Jordi Casamitjana against the LACS.

Read More
SA Law Red arrow neon light image
Views & Insights
GDPR - 6 Months On

Partner and Head of Employment & Data Protection Chris Cook comments on the impacts of GDPR over the past 6 months.

Read More

© SA LAW 2019

Every care is taken in the preparation of our articles. However, no responsibility can be accepted to any person who acts on the basis of information contained in them alone. You are recommended to obtain specific advice in respect of individual cases.