An 'Uber' Decision

The recent Uber Case Decision

On 28 October 2016 the London Central Employment Tribunal held that drivers engaged by Uber are not in fact self-employed contractors, but rather, they are ‘workers’. Clearly this new employment status has vast implications on Uber and similar companies that form part of the so-called ‘gig economy’.

Gig economy is a term given to the workforce in which someone is hired, usually through a digital platform, to work on demand, for a short-term engagement. Uber offers such a service via a mobile app which allows passengers to book a ride from their phone.

Before this decision, Uber's classification of drivers as self-employed contractors meant that they were not entitled to certain employment rights. However, the worker status brings with it an array of entitlement and now permits workers the following rights:

- Paid holiday leave;

- A maximum 48 hour average working week with rest breaks; and

- The national minimum wage.

Uber has always maintained that its drivers were categorised as self-employed contractors, as that was the status their drivers wanted. Indeed Uber engages its drivers with the tagline “Work for yourself, drive when you want, make the money you need”. Uber believed that its approach gave its drivers the flexibility to work as much or as little as they wanted. However, this recent ruling has highlighted the fact that contractual provisions regarding employment status are not necessarily definitive and may still be open to interpretation by a tribunal.

The common question of whether an individual is an employee, worker or self-employed contractor is not at all black and white. For years lawyers have debated this very issue and to date it remains impossible to outline a clear set of defining criteria against which an individual's status can be definitively determined.

• An employee is defined as "an individual who has entered into or works under a contract of employment".

• A worker is defined as an individual who has entered into or works under a contract of employment or any other contract, whereby the individual undertakes to do or perform personally any work or services for another party to the contract whose status is not by virtue of the contract that of a client or customer of any profession or business undertaking carried on by the individual.

Unfortunately, the distinction between the two is very blurred and so lawyers rely on a helpful test to assist in identifying employment status:

1) Personal service: Did the individual undertake under the contract to personally perform work or services?

2) Mutuality of obligation: was there mutuality of obligation between the individual and the "employer"?

3) Control: Was there control of the servant (individual) by the master (employer)?

Whilst this recent Uber decision is not binding, it has set a ground-breaking precedent that will most certainly impact all those working in the ‘gig economy’ and directly affect similar business models going forward.

Consequently, Uber drivers are now entitled to paid holiday, a decent living wage and regular paid breaks.

Unsurprisingly, Uber has confirmed that it will be seeking to appeal the decision. 

© SA LAW 2023

Every care is taken in the preparation of our articles. However, no responsibility can be accepted to any person who acts on the basis of information contained in them alone. You are recommended to obtain specific advice in respect of individual cases.

Read the latest Employment Views & Insights
They seek to understand their clients and advise accordingly to achieve the outcomes that they require for their business needs.
Chambers and Partners
SA Law Work Life red mug and glasses
SA Law Work Life red mug and glasses
Views & Insights
The Impact of Failure to Follow the Correct Procedure When Making Redundancies

Stephanie Clarke explains the legal consequences employers face if they fail to follow the correct redundancy procedures.

Read More
Photo of a red arrow SA Law
Views & Insights
Google: Parent Firm Alphabet Announces Worldwide Redundancies

Chris Cook comments on the recent redundancies made by Alphabet, a parent firm of Google.

Read More
Education Open Book SA Law
Views & Insights
Workers Who Breach Proposed Anti-Strike Law En Masse 'Unlikely' to Face Sackings

Gita Patel discusses the implications of the Government's proposed plans on anti-strike legislation.

Read More
Phone Box with Man in a Bowler Hat
As there is so much expertise on offer from SA Law they can provide a legal expert on all areas so that it can be handled under one roof.
Legal 500
SA Law Red arrow neon light image
Views & Insights
Which Way to go With Work From Home

In a recently published article, James Cresswell discusses flexible working and what it includes after James Dyson criticises the Government’s plans to…

Read More
SA Law Employment Laptop
Views & Insights
Staff Monitoring: Ensure you Consult Before Imposing a System

It’s becoming more common that employers want to avoid a ‘Big Brother’ management style when it comes to monitoring staff, so what’s the best way to do…

Read More
Education Open Book SA Law
Views & Insights
Changes to Employment Law

What do they mean for your business?

Read More
SA Law - Lightbulbs image with fillament
Views & Insights
Rolling Blackouts: What Does HR Need to Know?

What does HR need to know?

Read More
They are knowledgeable, with a commercial mindset, but also down to earth and friendly so it is easy to be very honest with them.
Chambers and Partners