Reading Borough Council v James and Others

Sun 17th Jun 2018

In the recent case of Reading Borough Council v James and others, the EAT held that a group of female employees’ contractual right to equal pay was not affected by the promotion of their comparator. The argument that the right to higher pay is curtailed where the comparator is promoted but alternative male comparators remain employed was rejected.

The Council’s appeal related to the employment tribunal’s decision that the claimants were entitled to equal pay, with arrears dating back to 2002, having found that the claimants were employed on work of equal value to that done by two male highway operatives. The Council had challenged the period over which the claimants’ right to equal pay was effective, highlighting firstly that one of the male comparators had been promoted in April 2006, and secondly that the other male comparator’s role had been assimilated onto a single status scheme at a lower rate of pay. The Council had put forward the argument that neither male was a valid comparator for the whole period of arrears. However, this approach was rejected by the tribunal, who instead found that the claimants were entitled to arrears of pay based on the first comparator’s pay in April 2006 and the second comparator’s unreduced salary.

The EAT dismissed the Council’s appeal, emphasising that the fact that there were other comparators available did not and could not undermine the claimants’ entitlement to equal pay. Furthermore, it was held that, once a comparator had been chosen, it was not open to the Council to contend for a “better” or “more appropriate” comparator.

Upon satisfaction of the conditions for the operation of the sex equality clause (implied into every employment contract) in 2002, it took effect and amended the claimants’ contracts, equalising them with the chosen comparator. The EAT held that no temporal limitation or other provision in the Equal Pay Act 1970 then restricted the continued implication of the equalised term in any way. As a result, the claimants’ right to higher pay crystallised in 2002 and would continue until their contracts are validly varied or terminated. The Council’s argument that an operative variation occurred because different valid comparators continued their role, whilst the one chosen by the claimants did not, was rejected. Similarly, in respect of the second comparator, despite his contract having been varied as at the time he was placed on the single status scheme, the claimants did not agree to a variation of their pay and were not assimilated. Therefore, their crystallised rights continued.

For the purposes of best practice, employers ought to take timely steps to ensure pay structures are free from unlawful sex discrimination. However, in the event that an equal pay claim is brought against an employer, they should take into account the EAT’s findings in this case in relation to comparators and crystallisation of the right to equal pay.

CONTACT CHRIS

If you would like more information or advice relating to this article or an Employment law matter, please do not hesitate to contact Chris Cook on 01727 798098.

© SA LAW 2024

Every care is taken in the preparation of our articles. However, no responsibility can be accepted to any person who acts on the basis of information contained in them alone. You are recommended to obtain specific advice in respect of individual cases.

Read the latest Employment Views & Insights
They seek to understand their clients and advise accordingly to achieve the outcomes that they require for their business needs.
Chambers and Partners
SA Law Employment Laptop
Views & Insights
The Risks of Using Biometric Technology in the Workplace

Biometric technology has become a way for businesses to securely guard access to physical workplaces, online company networks, and sensitive data, but…

Read More
Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
The New Changes to Employment Law

Emily Morrison was asked by City A.M to comment on the new changes to employment law coming into force on 6th April, and discusses what businesses…

Read More
SA Law Employment Laptop
Views & Insights
What Changes will we see to Flexible Working Requests?

With employees being given the right to request flexible working from ‘day one’ of their employment, Chris Cook and Emily Morrison explain…

Read More
Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
Injury to Feelings: Vento Bands Increased

The President of the Employment Tribunals has confirmed an increase in the compensation bands (known as Vento bands) awarded for injury to feeling in…

Read More
SA Law Employment Laptop
Views & Insights
Introducing Fees in the Employment Tribunal and the Employment Appeal Tribunal

The Ministry of Justice has launched an open consultation on introducing fees in the Employment Tribunal and Employment Appeal Tribunal. The proposed…

Read More
As there is so much expertise on offer from SA Law they can provide a legal expert on all areas so that it can be handled under one roof.
Legal 500
Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
Managing The Menopause at Work

The menopause can have a big impact on the day to day lives of employees. It is a natural part of aging and typically happens to women between the ages…

Read More
Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
Did Red Bull Shoot the Messenger?

Christine Caffrey gives an insight into the Christian Horner controversy after his female colleague accused the Red Bull F1 boss of “inappropriate…

Read More
SA Law Employment Laptop
Views & Insights
New ICO Guidance on Sharing Personal Data in Mental Health Emergencies

Employers need to plan ahead to ensure personal data can be shared appropriately to protect those affected by a mental health crisis.

Read More
Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
Employment Tribunal Compensation Limits from 6 April 2024

The Government has announced this year’s annual increase to Employment Tribunal compensation limits for certain tribunal awards and other statutory payments,…

Read More
They are knowledgeable, with a commercial mindset, but also down to earth and friendly so it is easy to be very honest with them.
Chambers and Partners