The end of disguised investment management fees?

New anti-avoidance provisions have brought management fees squarely into the firing line, and those most likely to be affected are individuals dealing with investment management for private equity or investment funds, involving either limited partnerships or limited liability partnerships.

Limited partnerships comprise both general partners, who deal with the day-to-day management of the business, and other partners, who do not take an active role in the management of the business. This structure was introduced to promote economic growth, offering an alternative but similar structure to limited companies. Despite having, among other things, comparatively light regulatory governance, limited partnerships generally lagged behind the popularity of limited companies in the marketplace. They nevertheless have become prevalent among private equity funds and other investment funds.

Previously, avoidance schemes have enabled annual fees to be paid as priority partnership shares on which income tax was not payable. To combat this, section 21 of the Finance Act 2015 introduced new provisions into the Income Tax Act 2007, which are relevant to disguised investment management fees arising on or after 6 April 2015. The scope of the legislation also covers arrangements entered into before this date, if the sum is payable on or after it, but it does not apply to carried interest (i.e. returns reflecting performance of investments) nor co-investments (i.e. investment by managers). There are also general anti-avoidance provisions designed to prevent the provisions being circumnavigated by other arrangements. So, for example, no regard is to be given to any arrangement which seeks as its main purpose, or one of its main purposes, to secure that the provisions do not apply.

As a brief synopsis, the new provisions provide that an individual (for instance, an investment manager) is liable to pay income tax on disguised fees arising through a trade if the fees were profits, including unrealised profits, of that trade and the individual was the person receiving or entitled to those profits.

So, just what is a ‘disguised fee’? In essence, it is equal to the proportion of a management fee that is untaxed, where it arises from an investment scheme (i.e. a collective investment scheme or an investment trust) to an individual who performs, directly or indirectly, investment management services under an arrangement involving at least one partnership. It is worth bearing in mind that a management fee can, in addition to actual money, also include something with a monetary value, such as a loan, an advance of expected future profit shares or an allocation of profits. In general, guaranteed sums will constitute management fees which are taxable and if any proportion goes untaxed, it will become taxable under these provisions.

The term ‘investment management services’ has been widely drafted and covers services seeking to raise funds for the scheme or acting with a view to assisting a body in which the scheme has made an investment to raise funds, researching potential investments for the scheme and dealing with property for the scheme (e.g. acquiring, managing or disposing of property). The provisions do make a distinction as to where the services are performed, so that services performed in the UK are treated as trade being carried on in the UK and, conversely, services performed outside the UK are treated as trade being carried on outside the UK. This is a move away from earlier draft legislation under which the trade was treated as being carried on entirely in the UK, even if only part of the services were performed in the UK.

What will the impact be? Well, as alluded to above, the new provisions are only intended to target those businesses making use of income tax avoidance schemes where a limited partnership or limited liability partnership is involved. HM Revenue & Customs have already anticipated that the new measures will not have a significant economic impact, nor will they significantly impact on organisations carrying out normal commercial transactions.

CONTACT PETER

If you would like more information or advice relating to this article or a Corporate law matter, please do not hesitate to contact Peter Goodman on 01727 798061.

© SA LAW 2019

Every care is taken in the preparation of our articles. However, no responsibility can be accepted to any person who acts on the basis of information contained in them alone. You are recommended to obtain specific advice in respect of individual cases.

The Knowledgable, professional and helpful team has a genuine dedication to its clients and delivers an excellent level of service.
Legal 500
SA Law View and Insights books
Views & Insights
Success for SA Law in Legal 500 2020

We are delighted to share that we have held our position in all of our main practice areas in Legal 500.

Read More
SA Law Commercial property
Megatrends image
Views & Insights
Digital Disruption: 6 ways to introduce disruptive technology into your business

Introducing disruptive innovation is the ticket to successful growth, but introducing change is difficult and challenging for any business.

Read More
SA Law Corporate
Views & Insights
Will Asda and Just Eat’s foodie joint venture be a success?

Joint venture of the future - Supermarkets and food delivery services. What are the legal implications and how will this impact the sector?

Read More
Corporate Night View of London SA Law
Megatrends image
Views & Insights
An SMEs guide to Digital Disruption

What does digital disruption mean and how to think disruptively.

Read More
SA Law  Commercial Red
Views & Insights
Things you need to know if you break-up with your co-founder who is also your life partner

It's common for entrepreneurs to have a partner in business who is also their partner in life. But if one is terminated, what are the legal regulations…

Read More
SA Law Corporate
Photo of a red arrow SA Law
Views & Insights
Life after BHS, Carillion & Patisserie Valerie: Is there light at the end of the tunnel for audit?

Vincent comments on audit scandals of the past and present, and what the future of the profession looks like in Accountancy Age.

Read More
Photo of a red arrow SA Law
Views & Insights
Patisserie Valerie’s battle against KPMG

Patisserie Valerie shareholders are looking at the liability of the accountants, auditors and now the administrators in relation to such a huge accounting…

Read More