Why pay gap rules may not work

SA Law Employment Partner Keely Rushmore shares her views on the Gender Pay Gap Reporting with Edward Fennell of The Times

The Gender Pay Gap rules came into force at the beginning of April 2017 and have caused quite a stir about whether the legislation will be effective for those required to publish reports.

British organisations that employee over 250 people are required to publish data on what female and male staff were paid on 31st March for public sector organisations and 5th April for businesses and charities. The reporting is meant to provide a holistic picture that highlights the difference between earnings of all female and all male employees across the entire organisation. It is not intended to address any un-equal pay issues between the sexes in similar roles. 

There are no formal penalties in place for those who do not conform to the reporting rules, but the rules do instil transparency that could be quite important reputationally. Businesses do not want to be seen as hiding this information or being out of step with the market generally. SA Law Senior Associate Keely Rushmore comments: 

"With 84% of women aged 16-30 stating they would consider an organisation's gender pay gap , and 80% saying they would compare it with other organisations when considering employment, it would be unwise not to take the issue seriously"

Keely goes on to add that gender pay gap reporting will not resonate with everyone: 

"Some qualifying businesses believe their investors, clients and prospective staff are motivated solely by financial performance and will not be concerned about gender pay gap issues." 

To read the full article please visit The Times website. Please note this article may be subject to a paywall. 

CONTACT KEELY

If you would like more information or advice relating to this article or an Employment law matter, please do not hesitate to contact Keely Rushmore on 01727 798046 
The team at SA Law LLP has ‘excellent knowledge of employment law’. Practice head Chris Cook is recommended.
The Legal 500
SA Law Work Life red mug and glasses
Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
Justifying 'fat cat' pay

Partner, Keely Rushmore examines what the pay ratio reporting could mean for your company

Read More
Stained glass window
Views & Insights
Should The Equalities Act 2010 be updated?

Chris Cook, partner and head of employment at SA Law, comments on a recent study which found that one in three employers admitted they were less likely…

Read More
Stained glass window
Views & Insights
Should employers modify dress codes in this heatwave?

Partner and Director of Finance and Business support, Gill Garrett, comments in The Times on whether extreme weather should see alterations to dress codes…

Read More
Chris Cook handles the full range of employment law for both individuals and organisations. He receives particular recognition for his strong TUPE expertise.…
Chambers & Partners
Phone Box with Man in a Bowler Hat
Stained glass window
Views & Insights
Getting to the meat of employee choice

Companies must be made aware of discrimination laws when dictating what workers can and can't do, says Keely Rushmore, Partner at SA Law.

Read More
Stained glass window
Views & Insights
Worker versus Self-Employed

The Gig economy makes more headlines as The Supreme Court agree Mr Smith was a worker and Pimlico plumbers had fallen foul of employment rights.

Read More
Stained glass window
Views & Insights
Reality TV and the protection of stars' welfare

Head of Employment at SA Law, Chris Cook comments in The Daily Star on the increasing pressure for production companies to ensure the welfare of contestants.

Read More
Stained glass window
Views & Insights
The Government's guidance on The Trade Union Act 2016

How should employers' implement the Trade Union Act 2016? Head of Employment at SA Law, Chris Cook explains.

Read More
Stained glass window
Views & Insights
Dress codes and sex discrimination - The Government's response

Read Head of Employment, Chris Cook's analysis of the Government's response to the 2015 Nicola Thorp "wear heels or go home" controversy.

Read More

© SA LAW 2018

Every care is taken in the preparation of our articles. However, no responsibility can be accepted to any person who acts on the basis of information contained in them alone. You are recommended to obtain specific advice in respect of individual cases.