Holiday Pay for part-time term-time workers

The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has decided that workers who work irregular hours throughout the year are entitled to holiday pay based on average earnings calculated over a 12 week period, rather than at a rate of 12.07% of annualised hours.

This issue was raised in Brazel v The Harpur Trust where a part-time teacher, working on a zero hours contract during term time, was required to take her 5.6 weeks’ annual leave during the school holidays. The school paid her holiday pay at the rate of 12.07% of her yearly earnings in line with the ACAS guidance. Mrs Brazel argued that receiving 12.07% of earnings is not the same as paying holiday by reference to a week’s pay pursuant to the Employment Rights Act 1996.

The Employment Tribunal (ET) initially dismissed Mrs Brazel’s claim stating that the application of the 12.07% calculation was correct. The ET found that to do otherwise would result in an “unfair windfall” as she would end up receiving circa 17.5% of her annualised hours as holiday pay. On appeal, the EAT reversed the decision maintaining that the overriding principle is that part-time workers are not to be treated less favourably than full-time workers; there is no principle to the opposite effect. It therefore found that the 12 week calculation was the correct method of establishing holiday pay and that the statutory scheme must not be read down to cap payments at 12.07% of annualised hours.

Whilst this finding is logical it does contradict the ACAS guidance of calculating holiday pay for those who work irregular hours. Employers who have implemented this method of calculation are therefore encouraged to review their practices in light of this new finding. 

CONTACT CHRIS

If you would like more information or advice relating to this article or an Employment law matter, please do not hesitate to contact Chris Cook on 01727 798098.

Read SA Law's latest employment views & insights
Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
Tesco’s “Fire and Rehire” Tactics

Dismissal and reengagement, also known as “fire and rehire”, is a practice that can be used by employers when employees refuse to agree to proposed new…

Read More
Lets Talk About It SA Law
Views & Insights
Truss’ “bonfire of workers’ rights” Leaves Lawyers Unconvinced

The Conservative Party’s Liz Truss wants to review existing EU worker protections in an attempt to improve the competitiveness of the UK economy.

Read More
Corporate Night View of London SA Law
Views & Insights
Changes to Right to Work Checks

Concessions on right to work checks implemented by the Home Office in the midst of the pandemic, came to an end on 30 September 2022. Gemma Jones explains…

Read More
SA Law - Lightbulbs image with fillament
Views & Insights
Holiday Pay for Part Year Workers

Under the Working Time Regulations, the 5.6 weeks’ annual leave entitlement must not be pro-rated for part-year workers on permanent contracts.

Read More
Red and yellow leaves, blue sky SA Law
Views & Insights
Why does employment status matter?

How do you know if your staff are employees, workers or self-employed, and what difference does it make?

Read More
Join our team puzzle piece SA Law
Views & Insights
SA Law Expands Employment Team

SA Law is proud to welcome James Cresswell and Stephanie Clarke to its employment team, bringing the team size up to seven qualified lawyers.

Read More
Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
Insolvency insights - the NMCN collapse

Insolvency solicitor, Helen Young and employment lawyer Nishma Chudasama consider what accountants can learn from the failure of NMCN.

Read More
Join our mailing list

Want our latest views & insight along with exclusive event invitations and much more sent directly to you?

Read More

© SA LAW 2023

Every care is taken in the preparation of our articles. However, no responsibility can be accepted to any person who acts on the basis of information contained in them alone. You are recommended to obtain specific advice in respect of individual cases.