Dress codes and sex discrimination - The Government's response

Last month the Government Equalities Office published its long-overdue guidance on dress codes and sex discrimination in response to the 2015 Nicola Thorp “wear heels or go home” controversy and the corresponding report by the House of Commons Petitions Committee and the Women and Equalities Committee.

The guidance, which can be found in full at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/dress-codes-and-sex-discrimination-what-you-need-to-know, sets out advice for employers on their legal responsibilities when compiling a workplace dress code policy and advice to employees on what to do if they believe that their rights have been infringed.

In respect of employers, the government confirms that dress codes can be a legitimate part of an organisation’s terms and conditions of service and that while dress policies for men and women do not have to be identical, the standards imposed should be equivalent. Specific recommendations include:

  • Considering the reasoning behind having a policy.
  • Consulting with employees, staff organisations and trade unions to ensure that the policy is acceptable.
  • Considering the health and safety implications of any requirements.
  • Avoiding gender specific requirements such as wearing high heels.
  • Avoiding the prohibition of religious symbols which do not interfere with an employee’s work.
  • Considering reasonable adjustments to dress codes for disabled workers.
  • Allowing transgender employees to follow the organisation’s dress code in a way which they feel matches their gender identity.

In respect of employees, the government briefly recommends that an employee who considers their rights have been infringed should speak to their manager in the first instance and then to their employer's human resources department. It advises that help can also be obtained from an employee's trade union, ACAS and EHRC.

Unfortunately, it appears that the government’s guidance on this matter has fallen short in a number of ways. It does not protect the rights of workers like Nicola Thorp herself and, therefore, not only overlooks the entire genesis of the matter but also finds itself at odds with the Equality Act 2010. It fails to impose stricter penalties on employers who enforce discriminatory dress codes, in turn, failing to pack the proverbial punch which the Committees had asked for in their report. Some would even go so far as to say that the government has paid mere lip service to an issue which merits a far more detailed analysis.

CONTACT CHRIS

If you would like more information or advice relating to this article or an Employment law or Data Protection matter, please do not hesitate to contact Chris Cook on 01727 798089.

Read the latest Employment Views & Insights
They seek to understand their clients and advise accordingly to achieve the outcomes that they require for their business needs.
Chambers and Partners
SA Law Work Life red mug and glasses
Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
BP Fuels Diversity and Inclusion Drive

Partner and Head of Employment & Data Protection Chris Cook comments in Personnel Today regarding BP's announcement of their new Diversity & Inclusion…

Read More
Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
Covid-19 and home-working mental health for the insurance industry

Keely comments on mental health issues faced by home-workers in the insurance industry plus duty of care and handling HR issues remotely during covid-19.

Read More
Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
Updates to off-payroll working in the private sector

Following the delay to the introduction of off-payroll working in the private sector, the government are introducing some amendments to the original proposals,…

Read More
Phone Box with Man in a Bowler Hat
As there is so much expertise on offer from SA Law they can provide a legal expert on all areas so that it can be handled under one roof.
Legal 500
Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme: update affecting notice periods

The Treasury has published a further Direction to provide rules that will govern the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (CJRS). Most of the rules in the…

Read More
Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme: Updated Guidance on Flexible Furloughing

Under the flexible furlough scheme, employees can work for some of the week and be furloughed for the rest, in proportions decided between employee and…

Read More
Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme: Key changes between July – October 2020

Keely explores the key changes to the Covid-19 related furloughing that are set to impact employers and employees between July-October 2020.

Read More
Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (CJRS) Direction and Extended Deadline

The Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme will be extended to 30 June 2020, plus The Treasury has also issued a Direction to HMRC which provides legally binding…

Read More
They are knowledgeable, with a commercial mindset, but also down to earth and friendly so it is easy to be very honest with them.
Chambers and Partners

© SA LAW 2020

Every care is taken in the preparation of our articles. However, no responsibility can be accepted to any person who acts on the basis of information contained in them alone. You are recommended to obtain specific advice in respect of individual cases.