Dress codes and sex discrimination - The Government's response

Last month the Government Equalities Office published its long-overdue guidance on dress codes and sex discrimination in response to the 2015 Nicola Thorp “wear heels or go home” controversy and the corresponding report by the House of Commons Petitions Committee and the Women and Equalities Committee.
Wed 27th Jun 2018

The guidance, which can be found in full at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/dress-codes-and-sex-discrimination-what-you-need-to-know, sets out advice for employers on their legal responsibilities when compiling a workplace dress code policy and advice to employees on what to do if they believe that their rights have been infringed.

In respect of employers, the government confirms that dress codes can be a legitimate part of an organisation’s terms and conditions of service and that while dress policies for men and women do not have to be identical, the standards imposed should be equivalent. Specific recommendations include:

  • Considering the reasoning behind having a policy.
  • Consulting with employees, staff organisations and trade unions to ensure that the policy is acceptable.
  • Considering the health and safety implications of any requirements.
  • Avoiding gender specific requirements such as wearing high heels.
  • Avoiding the prohibition of religious symbols which do not interfere with an employee’s work.
  • Considering reasonable adjustments to dress codes for disabled workers.
  • Allowing transgender employees to follow the organisation’s dress code in a way which they feel matches their gender identity.

In respect of employees, the government briefly recommends that an employee who considers their rights have been infringed should speak to their manager in the first instance and then to their employer's human resources department. It advises that help can also be obtained from an employee's trade union, ACAS and EHRC.

Unfortunately, it appears that the government’s guidance on this matter has fallen short in a number of ways. It does not protect the rights of workers like Nicola Thorp herself and, therefore, not only overlooks the entire genesis of the matter but also finds itself at odds with the Equality Act 2010. It fails to impose stricter penalties on employers who enforce discriminatory dress codes, in turn, failing to pack the proverbial punch which the Committees had asked for in their report. Some would even go so far as to say that the government has paid mere lip service to an issue which merits a far more detailed analysis.

CONTACT CHRIS

If you would like more information or advice relating to this article or an Employment law matter, please do not hesitate to contact Chris Cook on 01727 798098.

Read the latest Employment Views & Insights
They seek to understand their clients and advise accordingly to achieve the outcomes that they require for their business needs.
Chambers and Partners
Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
Responsible Data Sharing and Safeguarding Children

Working with organisations in law enforcement, education and social services , the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) ’Think, Check, Share’ campaign…

Read More
SA Law Employment Laptop
Views & Insights
ICO Issues Further Warning on the Use of Website Advertising Cookies

Are you giving website visitors fair personalised advertising choices?

Read More
SA Law Employment Laptop
Views & Insights
Statutory Paternity Leave Changes

Changes which take effect in April 2024 give employees more flexibility

Read More
Corporate Night View of London SA Law
Views & Insights
How do you Dismiss an Underperforming Director?

After the case of Sam Altman experiencing a mishandled director exit at OpenAI, Chris Cook and Vincent Billings discussed the lessons that be learned…

Read More
SA Law Employment Laptop
Views & Insights
The Importance of Employers Responding to Misconduct by Employees Fairly

Emily Morrison and Molly Hart discuss the importance of employers responding to matters of misconduct of employees and the issues that may arise if they…

Read More
As there is so much expertise on offer from SA Law they can provide a legal expert on all areas so that it can be handled under one roof.
Legal 500
Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
What are the Legal Risks for Business Using Employee Monitoring Software?

With remote working now being the norm for most businesses since the pandemic, the use of employee monitoring software has increased. However, with concerns…

Read More
Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
Probation Periods and How to Use Them Effectively

Integrate new employees quickly and support your decision making processes by following our helpful guide to making the most of probation periods

Read More
SA Law Employment Laptop
Views & Insights
New Holiday Pay Regulations Labelled as ‘Incoherent’

From 1st January 2024, the draft Employment Rights Regulations 2023 will take effect, however they appear to be “incoherent and complicated”. In a recent…

Read More
SA Law Employment Laptop
Views & Insights
UK Visa Eligibility Criteria Changes – Implications for Businesses

With changes expected to be implemented in Spring 2024, what can you do to prepare?

Read More
They are knowledgeable, with a commercial mindset, but also down to earth and friendly so it is easy to be very honest with them.
Chambers and Partners

© SA LAW 2024

Every care is taken in the preparation of our articles. However, no responsibility can be accepted to any person who acts on the basis of information contained in them alone. You are recommended to obtain specific advice in respect of individual cases.