Deliveroo riders’ lose latest challenge to their employment status

Basic worker rights not ‘delivered’ in latest development in the Deliveroo gig economy case

The latest challenge to the self-employed status of Deliveroo riders has failed following the High Court’s dismissal of the Independent Workers Union of Great Britain’s (IWGB) judicial review claim.

The IWGB, a trade union, sought to challenge the previous ruling of the Central Arbitration Committee (CAC) which found last November that Deliveroo riders are not workers for the purposes of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 (TULR(C)A) and therefore cannot benefit from the collective bargaining arrangements provided for under that legislation.

Deliveroo is an app-based takeaway delivery service and the riders, after successfully completing an application form, telephone interview and criminal record check, supply their own transport and mobile phone and pay £150 for an equipment pack which includes branded materials. Riders can then accept work through the app as and when they choose; there is no requirement for Deliveroo to offer work and no obligation on the riders to accept work. It is designed to be the ultimate means of flexible working.

Additionally, and a key factor in the gig economy case law to date, riders are allowed to provide a substitute of their choosing to carry out jobs on their behalf. Whilst the CAC struggled to understand why a rider would need to appoint a substitute, it held that personal service is a fundamental element of an employment relationship (and is explicitly set out in the definition of ‘worker’ under TULR(C)A). On this basis, it held that riders could not be deemed workers capable of being recognised by a union and entitled to benefit from the collective bargaining rights under the legislation.

In its challenge, the IWGB argued that it should be recognised by Deliveroo for the purposes of collective bargaining for its riders, which would allow it to bargain for, amongst other things, their terms and conditions and holiday pay. It alleged that to prevent this was in breach of the riders’ human rights under Article 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which explicitly gives individuals the right to join trade unions.

In the first case to look at gig worker status in relation to Article 11, the High Court rejected the judicial review challenge and held that Article 11 was not engaged as riders are not in an employment relationship with Deliveroo. Further, it held that even if Article 11 had been engaged, the exclusion of non-workers under TULR(C)A is justified in its aim of limiting the cases in which collective bargaining applies and this provides a valid exemption from Article 11.

This is unlikely to be the last we hear on the subject of employment status and the gig economy. The IWGB has already confirmed its intention to appeal the High Court’s decision, which it sees as denying Deliveroo riders, and presumably, others operating within the gig economy, basic worker rights.

Read more about the gig economy in the UK and gig economy workers’ rights by reading Chirs Cook’s article.

CONTACT CHRIS

If you would like more information or advice relating to this article or an Employment law or Data Protection matter, please do not hesitate to contact Chris Cook on 01727 798089.

Read the latest Employment Views & Insights
They seek to understand their clients and advise accordingly to achieve the outcomes that they require for their business needs.
Chambers and Partners
SA Law Work Life red mug and glasses
Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
BP Fuels Diversity and Inclusion Drive

Partner and Head of Employment & Data Protection Chris Cook comments in Personnel Today regarding BP's announcement of their new Diversity & Inclusion…

Read More
Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
Covid-19 and home-working mental health for the insurance industry

Keely comments on mental health issues faced by home-workers in the insurance industry plus duty of care and handling HR issues remotely during covid-19.

Read More
Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
Updates to off-payroll working in the private sector

Following the delay to the introduction of off-payroll working in the private sector, the government are introducing some amendments to the original proposals,…

Read More
Phone Box with Man in a Bowler Hat
As there is so much expertise on offer from SA Law they can provide a legal expert on all areas so that it can be handled under one roof.
Legal 500
Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme: update affecting notice periods

The Treasury has published a further Direction to provide rules that will govern the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (CJRS). Most of the rules in the…

Read More
Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme: Updated Guidance on Flexible Furloughing

Under the flexible furlough scheme, employees can work for some of the week and be furloughed for the rest, in proportions decided between employee and…

Read More
Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme: Key changes between July – October 2020

Keely explores the key changes to the Covid-19 related furloughing that are set to impact employers and employees between July-October 2020.

Read More
Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (CJRS) Direction and Extended Deadline

The Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme will be extended to 30 June 2020, plus The Treasury has also issued a Direction to HMRC which provides legally binding…

Read More
They are knowledgeable, with a commercial mindset, but also down to earth and friendly so it is easy to be very honest with them.
Chambers and Partners

© SA LAW 2020

Every care is taken in the preparation of our articles. However, no responsibility can be accepted to any person who acts on the basis of information contained in them alone. You are recommended to obtain specific advice in respect of individual cases.