Presidents propose uplift of the Vento Bands

In July 2017 the presidents of the Employment Tribunals issued a joint judicial consultation on the proposed changes to the Vento guidelines.

Background

The Vento Bands were established in the Court of Appeal case, Vento v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police. Three bands of compensation for injury to feelings awards to be were identified as follows:

  • Less serious cases (lower band) – £500 - £5,000
  • Serious cases (middle band) - £5,000 - £15,000
  • Most serious cases (upper band) - £15,000 - £25,000, with exceptional serious cases exceeding £25,000.

There was then a 20% uplift to the bands (in line with inflation in 2009) by the Employment Appeal Tribunal in Da’Bell v NSPCC and it was advised that Tribunals could adjust the bands in individual cases where there is ‘cogent evidence’ of rate change in the value of money.

Future uplift

The recent judicial consultation intends to bring clarification following the Court of Appeal’s ruling in Pereira de Souza v Vinci Construction UK Ltd that the 10% uplift to general damages in civil claims for matters such as pain and suffering or mental distress (the Simmons v Castle uplift) should correspond to injury to feelings in awards from the Tribunal.

The Presidential Guidance considers adjustment to the Vento figures for inflation. It seeks confirmation whether this is the correct measure to be applied, especially as it is used for assessment of general damages in personal injury cases.

The Guidance states that the new bands would apply to any claim presented on or after the date of its publication and the bands would then be uprated every 12 months thereafter without further consultation and based upon the most recent RPI value available. The bands would be rounded up or down to the nearest £1,000.

The Presidents are seeking responses by Friday, 25 August 2017 on whether RPI is the appropriate index in connection with uprating of awards and a stance on the proposed approach of the Vento bands.

An uplift of the Vento bands will in no doubt encourage early settlement, and employers should consider Settlement Agreements as an alternative to Tribunal proceedings, especially in less serious cases as the recent UNISON fees ruling means more claims are likely to be brought.

CONTACT CHRIS

If you would like more information or advice relating to this article or an Employment law matter, please do not hesitate to contact Chris Cook on 01727 798098.

© SA LAW 2023

Every care is taken in the preparation of our articles. However, no responsibility can be accepted to any person who acts on the basis of information contained in them alone. You are recommended to obtain specific advice in respect of individual cases.

Read the latest Employment Views & Insights
They seek to understand their clients and advise accordingly to achieve the outcomes that they require for their business needs.
Chambers and Partners
SA Law Employment Laptop
Views & Insights
What Impact Will the Recent Judgement for Deliveroo Riders Have on Employers and Employees?

After the Supreme Court ruled Deliveroo riders as self-employed, Beth Leng was asked to comment on the implications the decision will have on employers/employees…

Read More
Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
Improved Protection From Sexual Harassment for Employees

The Worker Protection (Amendment of Equality Act 2010) Bill has received Royal Assent.

Read More
SA Law Employment Laptop
Views & Insights
What Must Nokia do to Carry out Their Redundancies Legally?

Nokia recently announced that on the back of disappointing financial results they will be cutting up to 14,000 jobs worldwide by the end of 2026 in the…

Read More
Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
'Data Bridge’ for UK-US data transfers launched

What does the UK-US Data Bridge mean for UK businesses?

Read More
Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
Lynskey v Direct Line: £65k Damages Awarded for Failure to Make Reasonable Adjustments for Menopausal Employee

The recently published judgment in Lynskey v Direct Line Insurance Services Ltd [2022] highlights the risks involved in putting a disabled employee through…

Read More
As there is so much expertise on offer from SA Law they can provide a legal expert on all areas so that it can be handled under one roof.
Legal 500
SA Law Employment Laptop
Views & Insights
AECOM Ltd v Mallon: EAT Emphasises Discrimination Risks in Recruitment Process

The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) in AECOM Ltd v Mallon [2023] has upheld the employment tribunal's decision, affirming that an employer had an obligation…

Read More
SA Law Employment Laptop
Views & Insights
What Next for Wilko Employees?

With their employer in administration, Wilko job holders could be facing a range of possible outcomes.

Read More
Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
The Great Unretirement and How Your Business Can Benefit

Why are retirees returning to work and what does it mean for you as an employer?

Read More
SA Law Employment Laptop
Views & Insights
Will UK SME’s be Impacted by EU Gig Economy Law Reforms?

After it was recently announced that a new law will be created to help millions of gig workers gain the status and rights of an employee, Gita Patel was…

Read More
They are knowledgeable, with a commercial mindset, but also down to earth and friendly so it is easy to be very honest with them.
Chambers and Partners