Brexit and the Risk of Discrimination in Employment

Over the past decade, the UK has grown to become one of the most diverse and multicultural countries in the world with hundreds of thousands of EU citizens migrating for work.

Due to the rise in people relocating to the UK, the Home Office created a strict policy of ‘Right to Work’ checks requiring employers to be able to evidence that their employees hold the relevant documents evidencing their right to work in the UK.

The Home Office have imposed strict consequences for failing to complete these checks and hiring an illegal workers. Employers could face large financial civil penalties of up to £20,000 per illegal worker hired or, if the employer knowingly hires or has reasonable cause to believe that they are hiring an illegal worker, will have committed a criminal offence and could face up to 5 years imprisonment and/or an unlimited fine.

This would inevitably result in employers treating the hiring of new employees with caution to ensure they do not breach immigration requirements.

However, although businesses must be careful not to hire illegal workers, this cannot be satisfied only by refusing to hire anyone who is not British. This would be a breach of the Equalities Act, and could result in legal consequences of their own.

This is a key point to note with Brexit looming over the UK as many businesses are unsure how easy it will be to tell whether an EEA national still has the right to work in the UK post Brexit. In addition, there are concerns over the ability to retain EEA national workers when it is unclear what “visa” regime they may be subject to in future.

Businesses should not respond to the uncertainty of Brexit by declining to hire an EEA national on the basis of their nationality as this open themselves up to a discrimination claim based on an individual’s nationality.

Discrimination can materialise itself in two forms; direct and indirect discrimination. Direct discrimination is when someone is treated less favourably for a specific reason, for example, not hiring someone because they are an EEA national. Indirect discrimination may be harder to identify. This is when a practice or policy is in place which applies to everyone, but has a worse effect on a specific group, for example, only giving permanent employment contracts to employees who hold settled status (British nationality or permanent residence), with other employees receiving fixed term contracts, only affecting EEA citizens.

The consequences of refusing to hire based on nationality is a potential risk of an Employment Tribunal claim being brought, which could be costly to businesses and cause reputational damage.

Instead, other more positive responses to how to prepare for Brexit could include:

  • Developing policies to attract and retain their EEA national workers e.g. offering flexible working/benefits packages;
  • providing immigration support to their EEA national workers; and
  • lobbying the Government for effective immigration policy for EEA nationals in the future.

As things stand, EEA and Swiss nationals currently hold the unrestricted right to work in the UK under the European principal of the free movement of people, and will continue to do so at least until the UK formally exit’s the EU. Whilst they have the free right to work in the UK, they should be considered on the basis of their skills/experience alone and not face prejudicial treatment on the grounds of their nationality.

In terms of how Brexit may change the right to work of EEA nationals, those citizens with Permanent Residence, should be guaranteed to retain their right to work in the UK following Brexit(although they may be required to make a “settled status” application once the new Immigration Policy as a result of Brexit is announced). Permanent Residence is currently available for EEA nationals who have resided in the UK for 5 continuous years as a worker, student, self-employed, and/or self-sufficient person. By applying for a Permanent Residence visa, EEA nationals should continue to maintain their employment rights, regardless of the final deal made.

Theresa May has also suggested that those who do not yet qualify for Permanent Residence but entered the UK before the ‘specified date’ (expected to be sometime between 30 March 2017, when Article 50 was triggered, and 29 March 2019, when Brexit is to take place) will be permitted to remain in the UK following Brexit. Therefore, it is highly unlikely that many EEA citizens will lose their right to work in the UK following Brexit.

There is nothing to suggest that EEA citizens currently in the UK will lose the right to work following Brexit, therefore it is unjustified to discriminate against job applicants based on nationality. Employers should continue to operate as they always have done but keep an eye on future Brexit updates from the Government to stay in the know.


If you would like more information or advice relating to this article or an Employment law matter, please do not hesitate to contact Chris Cook on 01727 798089.


If you would like more information or advice relating to this article or an Immigration law matter, please do not hesitate to contact Gemma Goodhead on 0203 7183 5683 or on

© SA LAW 2019

Every care is taken in the preparation of our articles. However, no responsibility can be accepted to any person who acts on the basis of information contained in them alone. You are recommended to obtain specific advice in respect of individual cases.
The team at SA Law LLP has ‘excellent knowledge of employment law’. Practice head Chris Cook is recommended.
The Legal 500
SA Law Work Life red mug and glasses
Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
Proposed changes to NDA rules 'not enough to end workplace harassment'

Partner Keely Rushmore comments in People Management about the government's announcement.

Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
Smart Exits: Protected Conversations and Termination Payments

Chris Cook addresses the most appropriate ways of reaching a settlement when managing an employee's exit from a company.

Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
Increased rights for agency and zero-hours workers

The ‘Good Work Plan’ aims to address the rights of those with atypical worker statuses, including agency workers and those on zero-hours contracts.

Chris Cook handles the full range of employment law for both individuals and organisations. He receives particular recognition for his strong TUPE expertise.…
Chambers & Partners
Phone Box with Man in a Bowler Hat
Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
Consultation into extending redundancy protection for pregnant women and new parents

New consultation for redundancy protection while on or shortly after maternity leave or shared parental leave.

Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
A guide to flexible working & flexible working requests

Flexible working can assist employers in attracting and retaining talented candidates and staff. Our guide covers the key questions and considerations…

SA Law Red arrow neon light image
Views & Insights
Google issued with £44m fine over GDPR breach

Head of Employment and Data Protection, Chris Cook, explains Google's GDPR breach that led to landmark £44 million fine.

Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
CEO and average worker pay gap reporting launches

Latest comment in HR Magazine: Keely explains what HR teams should know about the CEO and average worker pay gap regulations, which come into force in…

Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
Deliveroo riders’ lose latest challenge to their employment status

The latest development in the Deliveroo gig-economy case sees riders appeal for trade union representation denied