ICO prosecutes company employees for unlawfully accessing client data

A former employee of Lex Autolease Ltd has been prosecuted and fined under section 55 of the Data Protection Act 1998. The employee illegally accessed personal data records of 551 customers of the Company which related to road traffic accidents. The employee accessed the records on his employer's computer and then emailed them to his private email address, which he then sold to a third party as personal leads.

Section 55 covers the unlawful obtaining, disclosing or procuring of personal data, which is a criminal offence. The ICO has warned that employees should “be aware that documents containing personal data they have produced or worked on belong to their employer and are not theirs to take with them when they leave.”

Currently the offence is punishable by way of a fine only, but the ICO continues to call for more effective deterrent sentences, including the threat of prison, to be available to the courts to stop the unlawful use of personal information.

The employee pleaded guilty to two charges under section 55 of the DPA at Manchester Magistrates' Court. He was fined £500 and ordered to pay prosecution costs of £364 and a £25 victim surcharge.

Employers should notify the ICO if they are concerned that an individual is misusing personal data, especially if those individuals have access to customer data or are moving to competitors. Informing the ICO will assist in the company avoiding any criticism for covering up or not taking proper action to remedy a data breach.

It is important that employees who have access to commercially sensitive information are employed on strict contractual terms. Such terms should include express confidentiality provisions applying during and after termination of employment and obligations to return all company property and information when leaving the company.

This case demonstrates that the consequences of an employee taking any confidential or customer information can be a criminal offence, in addition to any other consequences arising from a breach of their employment obligations. Whilst the threat of a criminal sentence may be a deterrent, employers should also have in place appropriate security measures supported by policies, procedures and well-trained staff in order to minimise the risk of personal data being compromised. These protections should not only seek to prevent confidential information being stolen in the first place, but also from being used subsequently.

CONTACT CHRIS

If you would like more information or advice relating to this article or an Employment law matter, please do not hesitate to contact Chris Cook on 01727 798089.

© SA LAW 2018

Every care is taken in the preparation of our articles. However, no responsibility can be accepted to any person who acts on the basis of information contained in them alone. You are recommended to obtain specific advice in respect of individual cases.
The team at SA Law LLP has ‘excellent knowledge of employment law’. Practice head Chris Cook is recommended.
The Legal 500
SA Law Work Life red mug and glasses
Stained glass window Employment SA Law
Views & Insights
Justifying 'fat cat' pay

Partner, Keely Rushmore examines what the pay ratio reporting could mean for your company

Read More
Stained glass window
Views & Insights
Should The Equalities Act 2010 be updated?

Chris Cook, partner and head of employment at SA Law, comments on a recent study which found that one in three employers admitted they were less likely…

Read More
Stained glass window
Views & Insights
Should employers modify dress codes in this heatwave?

Partner and Director of Finance and Business support, Gill Garrett, comments in The Times on whether extreme weather should see alterations to dress codes…

Read More
Chris Cook handles the full range of employment law for both individuals and organisations. He receives particular recognition for his strong TUPE expertise.…
Chambers & Partners
Phone Box with Man in a Bowler Hat
Stained glass window
Views & Insights
Getting to the meat of employee choice

Companies must be made aware of discrimination laws when dictating what workers can and can't do, says Keely Rushmore, Partner at SA Law.

Read More
Stained glass window
Views & Insights
Worker versus Self-Employed

The Gig economy makes more headlines as The Supreme Court agree Mr Smith was a worker and Pimlico plumbers had fallen foul of employment rights.

Read More
Stained glass window
Views & Insights
Reality TV and the protection of stars' welfare

Head of Employment at SA Law, Chris Cook comments in The Daily Star on the increasing pressure for production companies to ensure the welfare of contestants.

Read More
Stained glass window
Views & Insights
The Government's guidance on The Trade Union Act 2016

How should employers' implement the Trade Union Act 2016? Head of Employment at SA Law, Chris Cook explains.

Read More
Stained glass window
Views & Insights
Dress codes and sex discrimination - The Government's response

Read Head of Employment, Chris Cook's analysis of the Government's response to the 2015 Nicola Thorp "wear heels or go home" controversy.

Read More