Government introducing personal liability for directors for nuisance call fines

The Department for Culture, Media and Sport has announced that it will amend the Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/2426) (PECR) in spring 2017 to introduce personal liability for directors for nuisance call fines.

This will form part of the Digital Economy Bill. Although the Bill is mainly intended to improve internet connectivity and provide improved protections for internet users, it also aims to protect individuals by introducing a new statutory Code of Practice for direct marketing, to ensure better enforcement of sanctions against nuisance callers and that consent is obtained from consumers.

The PECR already requires companies to display their caller ID and provide call blocking devices to vulnerable individuals, but so far this has not been enough. The upcoming amendments will allow the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) to issue fines of up to £500,000 to each company director for nuisance calls. If a company has multiple directors then each could be liable for a fine.

According to the ICO, it has issued more than £2.7 million in penalties for nuisance calls since April 2015. However, £2.26 million of those penalties remain unpaid. Many limited liability companies try to avoid the fines by declaring bankruptcy but then subsequently resurface with a new name. On 23 October 2016, the Information Commissioner (IC), Elizabeth Denham welcomed the government's new plans, stating:

“Making directors responsible will stop them ducking away from fines by putting their company into liquidation. It will stop them leaving by the back door as the regulator comes through the front door”.

In preparation for the upcoming changes, as an employer you should conduct a thorough review of your company's marketing policies and procedures in order to minimise the risk of a personal fine for your directors.

Personal data collection procedures should be reviewed or put in place. A clear notice should be provided to individuals stating how the data will be used. Consent must be provided by individuals when using their data for marketing purposes.

You should put in place a contract when dealing with third parties who buy, sell, rent or share personal data. It should ensure that both parties understand how the data should be used, who it will be shared with, how complaints will be handled and who will be liable for complying with data protection provisions. It is vital that ongoing monitoring is put in place to ensure that both parties are complying with the provisions of the contract.

Finally, you must remember that if an individual requests that they are not contacted for marketing purposes, their details are placed on a separate and up-to-date internal “do not contact” list, as opposed to just deleting their details, which will serve as a reminder not to include their details in a further marketing campaigns.

The ICO has produced guidance for organisations that are involved with electronic and telephone marketing which can act as a useful starting point in order to ensure compliance. Such guidance can be found on the ICO’s website.

CONTACT KEELY

If you would like more information or advice relating to this article or an Employment law matter, please do not hesitate to contact Keely Rushmore on 01727 798046 

© SA LAW 2018

Every care is taken in the preparation of our articles. However, no responsibility can be accepted to any person who acts on the basis of information contained in them alone. You are recommended to obtain specific advice in respect of individual cases.
The team at SA Law LLP has ‘excellent knowledge of employment law’. Practice head Chris Cook is recommended.
The Legal 500
Banner Work Life red mug and glasses
Stained glass window
Views & Insight
Getting to the meat of employee choice

Companies must be made aware of discrimination laws when dictating what workers can and can't do, says Keely Rushmore, Partner at SA Law.

Read More
Stained glass window
Views & Insight
Worker versus Self-Employed

The Gig economy makes more headlines as The Supreme Court agree Mr Smith was a worker and Pimlico plumbers had fallen foul of employment rights.

Read More
Stained glass window
Views & Insight
Reality TV and the protection of stars' welfare

Head of Employment at SA Law, Chris Cook comments in The Daily Star on the increasing pressure for production companies to ensure the welfare of contestants.

Read More
Chris Cook handles the full range of employment law for both individuals and organisations. He receives particular recognition for his strong TUPE expertise.…
Chambers & Partners
Phone Box with Man in a Bowler Hat
Stained glass window
Views & Insight
The Government's guidance on The Trade Union Act 2016

How should employers' implement the Trade Union Act 2016? Head of Employment at SA Law, Chris Cook explains.

Read More
Stained glass window
Views & Insight
Dress codes and sex discrimination - The Government's response

Read Head of Employment, Chris Cook's analysis of the Government's response to the 2015 Nicola Thorp "wear heels or go home" controversy.

Read More
Stained glass window
Views & Insight
To ban, or not to ban social media? That is the question

Employment Partner, Keely Rushmore writes for City A.M.

Read More
Stained glass window
Views & Insight
Reading Borough Council v James and Others

Head of Employment, Chris Cook discusses a recent case and gives some advice about how employers can avoid unlawful sex discrimination.

Read More
Stained glass window
Views & Insight
Managing your team during the 2018 FIFA World Cup

With the World Cup underway, we've produced some tips to help you manage your team during this years' Tournament.

Read More