Main Image

Early Warning

Glenda Ferneyhough discusses a recent case prompting practitioners to draw their clients' attention to the details of a lease, as well as other decisions of interest to conveyancers.

The recent decision of the Upper Tribunal of the Lands Chamber in the case of Roundlistic Ltd v Jones and another [2016] UKUT 325 (TCC) is salutary reading for anyone who might be tempted to bypass providing a client with a detailed explanation as to the terms of the lease they are about to purchase.

In the case, the respondent tenant's lease of a maisonette had been extended under the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993. The tenant sublet a maisonette under an assured shorthold tenancy. The lease did not contain a covenant against subletting but did limit the use to that of 'a single dwelling house in the occupation of the lessee and his family'.

To read the full article, please click here.

CONTACT GLENDA

If you would like more information or advice relating to this article or a Commercial Property law matter, please do not hesitate to contact Glenda Ferneyhoughon 01727 798071.

© SA LAW 2017

Every care is taken in the preparation of our articles. However, no responsibility can be accepted to any person who acts on the basis of information contained in them alone. You are recommended to obtain specific advice in respect of individual cases.